Laura Anderson

Laura has been studying paganism for nine years, with an interest in Irish reconstruction and Northern heathenism. She has a BA in English from Colorado State University and is currently enrolled in the Pagan Advocacy department at Cherry Hill Seminary. She founded the Northern Colorado Covenant of the River and is currently networking with pagans in southern Colorado. She considers herself politically moderate, with tendencies toward being fiscally conservative, ethically liberal, and generally supporting little government involvement in citizens’ person lives and companies’ business lives.

 

So I’m aware that I’ve been remiss in my duties here – it’s been well over a month since I posted. The reason for that is kind of my thoughts for this week’s blog. My husband and I had our wedding ceremony on Lughnasadh, and the two months prior ate up all of my free time. I failed to comprehend just how much work goes into planning something like that! I feel like my life hasn’t actually managed to recover yet – work went crazy while I was gone, and my husband and I didn’t have much time to take care of the house during those months, so we’re still recovering from oodles of mess.

My post today is kind of a strange one, I think. Because of my life craziness, I don’t have the time to do a well-researched post, but I want to talk a bit about marriage because of the events in my personal life coinciding with the repeal on Proposition 8. That’s where I’m headed with this post: my thoughts on the institution of marriage. But first, a bit of history for me and my husband.

We decided to get married in May of 2009. We found a beautiful location up in the mountains, close to home, and we put down a deposit. We started making plans and putting down more deposits. And then several months later we realized that we were going to be moving so he could return to finish up his bachelor’s degree. I had always wanted a Lughnasadh wedding. In Ireland, Lughnasadh was the time of year when anything relating to legality was dealt with, and I wanted to say my vows in front of friends, family, and gods on Lughnasadh in honor of that history and tradition.

But we found out that insurance through my husband’s school sucked. It was horrible. So we needed to get him on my insurance several months after open enrollment. Which meant a change of status – and the easiest way was to document marriage. So six months before the wedding we signed our paperwork, I changed my name, and then I had to deal with all the crap from my extended family (“if you’re already married, why have the ceremony?”).

Marriage became split for me, and I had to spend a lot of time thinking about the different aspects of it. The legal bit was very important. But it was only half of the process. The religious side was vital to me, even if our ceremony was only ten minutes long. Standing up there, hearing our officiant invoke our gods, and knowing that we were making our vows before everyone and everything important to us – I can’t express how important that was. As a heathen, the making of an oath is done before friends, family, and gods, and this was the most important oath of my life to date.

Shortly after we got back, I got wind of Prop 8. And I cheered like mad. Then I heard that Mexico City is ordering the entire country to recognize any marriage performed there, hetero- or homo- sexual in nature. And again, I cheered like mad. Iceland has legalized gay marriage, too.

Because what I learned during my marriage fiasco is that marriage is important legally and spiritually. I love the family I was born into, don’t get me wrong, but I want my spouse to be able to make important decisions if I’m incapable of making them. I want him authorizing medical procedures or financial procedures because I have chosen him to trust with those important decisions. Marriage – and love, in my opinion – isn’t bound by gender, nor should it be. It’s about individual people, oathing to take care of each other financially, emotionally, medically, physically, spiritually. And if the state can’t recognize that it’s about the people involved in the relationship, gay or straight, two or three or twenty people, the state is trying to determine for those people what is right and who can take care of you. They’re forcing that decision to be out of the control of the people, and rewarding what they think of as “correct” behavior. And we’re in a much more modern time, where people think for themselves and act for themselves. Let them marry as they will, so long as they uphold the oaths they make to each other.

As a side note, here are the vows my husband and I made to each other:

Do you promise to be a good spouse? Do you promise to display courage, truth, honor, frith, discipline, hospitality, self-reliance, industriousness, and perseverance in your marriage? Do you promise to challenge x and help him grow?

We are one when together
We are one when parted
We share all
We will raise warriors*

*These four lines I can attribute to Karen Traviss. They’re the Mandalorian wedding vows, and we felt the need to incorporate them into our wedding. It was partly honoring the ethics we both hold dear and partly playing on our geekish love of Star Wars.

 

A patriot is defined as “one who loves his or her country” (Merriam-Webster 1997 edition). It’s a nice, simple definition, in theory. But love of country means a lot of different things to a lot of different people.

I consider myself a patriot. I like living in the USA. That doesn’t mean I think we’re without error and flaw. Some of our systems are broken and need fixing. Some need done away with. Some are decent as they stand. Patriotism is not and should not be a blind love of country. Actually, blind love of anything doesn’t work well for me. It’s why I’m pagan. And part of being patriotic is working to fix those things that don’t work and aren’t right.

I see my relationship with this country as almost any relationship I enter into: give and take, balance, work, and dialogue. I’ve never agreed with “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” What I can do for my country isn’t enough to make the relationship worthwhile. It has to do something for me, too. I liken it to any working relationship: my kindred, my husband, even my relationships with my gods.

I enjoy a lot of freedoms, and I believe in working to gain the other freedoms I want. It’s an uphill battle, a lot of the time, but more and more my side of the battle is gaining ground. I don’t feel like I always have to hide my religion. Sometimes, yes, and that’s simply part of the fight.

I expect a lot out of my country, to be honest, and it doesn’t always deliver. We can backtrack and then things go to hell for a little while, and then we make another strive forward. Then again, I don’t. always hold up my end, either.

Patriotism isn’t about obedience. It isn’t about thinking we live in a perfect society. It’s a willingness to enter into a relationship and fight to keep that relationship working, and it has to be held up on both ends.

 

Happy Memorial Day, all! I feel like I have a lot to say about Memorial Day but no clear place to start. To be honest, there’s a lot I want to say. This is a bit of a personal post.

I “feel” Memorial Day more keenly this year than in the past. My father was in the Air Force, and both my grandfathers served in the military (I’m not sure what branches), but I never really had much attachment to the military. Dad never talked much about what he did with the Air Force and I never knew either grandfather.

This year, though, I have a brother in the Air Force and I live in a military city for the first time in my life. Half the people in my apartment complex are military of some form, and I can’t even make a trip to the dog park without hearing about our military. It’s a constant in my life suddenly, and I have more of an emotional connection to Memorial Day than I ever have before.

It’s a solemn occasion for me. Death is a solemn thing. I haven’t stared it in the face and come back. So I have only respect for those who have, and respect for those who’ve died fighting. Oddly enough, last week I discovered Hauk, and their motto is “No mercy for the slain.” It fits this weekend. Those who’ve been killed in battle, I believe, will be spending their afterlives in Valhalla until one day they will fight again. And many of them will die yet again in that battle.

My husband and I decided today was the perfect day to discover one of the local cemeteries. I have an interesting relationship with graveyards. For me, a cemetery is peace, quiet, and the place to reflect. I remember visiting graveyards as a child with my parents, and again when I started college. Getting to know a local graveyard is one way I get to know a city.

My husband has some basic knowledge of Haitian Vodou, and while neither of us practice, he occasionally draws a practice or information from there. My issues with cultural appropriation aside, we talked it over and decided it would be best to honor the Bawon (Barren) of the graveyard and the Ghede. The Barren is the spirit that watches over the graveyard; the Ghede are the souls of the forgotten dead.

We left coins at the gate for the Barren and Hot Tamales for the Ghede (they like spicy food and drink, according to my husband), and then decided to picnic amongst the dead. We found a beautiful sunny spot near the chapel and sat down to eat. I felt the need to honor my British Isles ancestry a bit, and we wound up leaving a bite of roast beef for the Grim.

I don’t, generally engage in any kind of fights that could result in my death. I prefer to fight with words. So it’s really important for me to take a moment to think about all those who have died fighting for me. Sitting in a graveyard gives me plenty of time to think about the dead.

The best way for me to do that, really, is song. So other than Hauk (specifically, “No Mercy”, I’ve had a lot of Dropkick Murphys playing, namely The Green Fields of France and Last Letter Home.

I know that there are those who protest at military funerals for whatever reason. To me, that’s not the proper forum for that. The dead are dead. Whether I like what they died for or not, whether I think it’s a good cause or not, they gave their life defending their country.

So today, I raise the horn in honor of the fallen and drink to them.

 

It’s time for my company’s annual shareholder’s meeting and time to vote on company proposals. I got the letter in the mail giving me instructions on where to look up what we’d be voting on, and I requested a paper copy. My husband said I was crazy to bother. My company is a multi-billion dollar corporation with thousands, or more likely millions of shareholders; I only have a couple of shares. It’s pointless to vote, he says.

How many times have we heard this about voting in general? I agree; one vote in millions isn’t anything numerically. And I don’t hold to Kant, who would ask (and I’m way paraphrasing and not doing his philosophy justice), “What if nobody voted?” That’s not a good way to make decisions.

But I still believe in the importance of placing my vote. It’s not necessarily getting my voice heard, because I’m not the type to shout over so many voices (says the blogger, right). It’s about having a voice in the first place.

I’m blessed to be as young as I am. I haven’t been around long enough to fight for the right to vote. And to be honest, I take that for granted. I live in a country that lets me have a voice and encourages me to use it, even if I’m only one in millions.

Voting lets me help my people, if only in a small way. It is my right as an American, and I’ve made it my duty and responsibility as well. Educating myself about who I want to represent my people, the laws that will be going into effect, and then working to make that decision is a duty.

America has an amazing lack of censorship. Yeah, it’s not perfect. We’re working on that. But here I am, low-wage worker woman, and I can access enough information about what my government is doing. I can sit down here and write “That’s awesome” or “That’s crap” all I want and the worst I’ll get is some nasty comments on my opinion. I am mostly free to express myself however I want.

Placing that vote is important to me personally. I only kind of understand the folks who don’t want to vote. Some of it is laziness (I love my husband, but he’s guilty of this one!), some of it is refusing to partake in an imperfect system. And I’m not telling you that you should change any of those reasons why you don’t vote, if that’s your choice.

But for me, it’s my duty to my people and my country to vote. It’s my duty to honor what my ancestors fought for the right to do. And it’s my duty to myself to express my voice.

 

Law and morality frequently go hand in hand, and it’s a difficult line to draw. How much morality should law dictate? About what? I’m glad we have laws and punishment against theft and murder (though is theft always wrong?). But some laws cross that line.

I say this because every couple of years, someone in Colorado attempts to amend our State Constitution in a way that I don’t like. A few years ago it was to define marriage. Now it’s to define personhood. Personhood USA tried to pass it two years ago, and they’re at it again. Protect Families, Protect Choices is fighting with them, and I say wonderful for PFPC. We’re prepping for a(nother) massive showdown between the two.

I’m not a big fan of abortion. It’s not something I could do unless circumstances were dire, and even then it would be incredibly painful and difficult. And I think women who abort fetuses because they were unwilling to take precautionary measures are stupid. I’m a young woman in my child-bearing prime, looking at having children in the next couple years, and I’m well aware of the hormonal effect on my mind and body. And I do very strongly view unnecessary abortions as murders. The thought makes me sick to my stomach.

But as sick as it makes me, I also understand rape victims. I understand aborting to save the mother’s life. And to an extent, I understand aborting if not doing so means that child would have a horrible life, say on the streets or something similar. In all cases, I would prefer the child be adopted out. But I understand.

And I accept that it is not my place to make that kind of a decision for another person. I wouldn’t want anybody except my husband influencing an already difficult decision if it was me, and it’s nobody else’s right to get involved in that.

As I was complaining to my husband about this amendment, he asks me if I’ve heard about Oklahoma. They passed a law that says that women who are seeking abortion must answer a bunch of very personal questions, and their answers will be anonymously posted online.

But the worst part of this law is that doctors are required to give the woman an ultrasound and describe, in detail, the parts of the fetus that the mother is looking at.

Take a moment to consider that. I would imagine that most women seeking abortion are already suffering from some emotional pain. And I can only think that this law is cruel, unusual, and torturous to women seeking an abortion. Consider, too, that this law is required for all women seeking an abortion. Never mind what else is going on in that woman’s life that could be causing emotional pain. Just tack on a bunch of horrible questions. Twist the knife a little bit deeper.

Are we keeping in mind that abortion is completely legal, too? Why in the world are these women going to be forced to go through this for something legal? Pregnancy and abortion are big deals. Spiritually, physically, emotionally, they aren’t easy for people. So why make an already tough situation even worse?

Chris Pramas, founder of Green Ronin Publishing, offers a more humorous response to this. I encourage everybody to read it.

 

I don’t know how much word is getting passed about Arizona’s new immigration laws in the rest of the country or how big a deal other news networks are making it in the rest of America. But in good ole’ Colorado, it’s major. We have a large number of immigrant workers here, and the bulk of them do tend to be of Hispanic origin. I’ve worked with a lot of immigrant workers from all over the world and there are a ton of problems that come with being a migrant worker, especially a non-white migrant worker. There’s a lot of racial profiling that occurs, a lot of snide jokes, and mixed government response.

Let me preface this by saying that I really wish all immigrants would come in legally, mostly for tax and economic reasons. But that’s not a reality right now. The reality is that a lot of people can’t afford to come in to the states legally. This creates a lot of problems for their children, by the way, who wind up losing out on education because of their own illegal status.

In spite of my desire to see immigration made a little easier on folks, the Arizona bill has me mad. I’m okay with the theory behind it, too. The idea is that Arizona police must check immigration papers if they have probable cause to suspect someone of being an illegal immigrant.

What gets me mad is that there is absolutely zero good way to get probable cause. I’ve known legal immigrants and I’ve known illegal immigrants. And the only way we ever knew if they were illegal was if they said so or they were found out and deported. Illegalization happens for a lot of reasons, too. Overstaying a visa, inability to pay to renew a visa but inability to pay to leave…. I get it. I don’t like it, but I get it.

I have to admit that I share concerns that this bill is going to turn into more cases of racial profiling than anything else. I don’t know what else qualifies as probable cause, and it seems that Governor Jan Brewer isn’t quite sure, either. And this bill isn’t actually tackling the problem of illegal immigration. It doesn’t propose ways of keeping illegal immigrants out. It simply says that the cops can ask any person at any time to prove their status.

So what could Arizona do to make me (and a large number of other people) happy? Actually detail some ways that police could have reasonable suspicion that an individual is an immigrant. Publish this list in high profile places where almost everybody can get access to it. And then start enacting procedures that deal with the heart of the problem instead of the aftermath.

And for the record, I raise my glass to Officer Martin H. Escobar. I believe that small acts can be heroic, and he’s my hero of the week. He’s a legal immigrant, now citizen of the US who is being asked to do something that he feels is not only wrong but unconstitutional. And he’s using the system to protest the bill.

 

Quick Preface: Nobody in America likes to think that sometimes the law isn’t enough. We hold the Constitution high, we hold our Courts high, and we strive toward the belief that they are the answer to all. But sometimes, they just fall short of what we as citizens need. So what do we do when the law falls short? I want to examine that at least a little bit here, examining some of the issues surrounding the GLBT community.

According to Servicemembers United, the number of GLBT service members who were discharged last year fell to an all-time low: only 443. 2008 saw 640 discharged. And there are currently a number of plans to get the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell rules repealed and replaced. It’s an exciting time for the GLBT community and a time with a lot of tension. Those with the loudest voices are being most obnoxious.

We were discussing issues relating to homosexuality and marriage and children and all that accompanies alternative family structures in class last week and we uncovered some amazing things about homophobia. And I really want to share some of those things here for a number of reasons, which I’ll discuss first.

Changing the laws is a great thing. I support equal rights for the GLBT and polyamorous communities absolutely. But changing the law to allow for “nontraditional” families is only the first step. It’s a huge first step, don’t get me wrong, but it’s just a battle in the war against bigotry. Sometimes the law isn’t enough, and that’s where the rest of us come in.

Fighting bigotry is about changing people’s beliefs and attitudes. It’s a dirty fight, too, one that requires devious plotting and thinking. Like BBC, for example, trying to figure out what people think about how the LGBT community is portrayed in their media. Sheer genius, I tell you. Because guess what? If we act like we don’t need to freak out about homosexuality, people eventually start to realize that we don’t need to freak out about homosexuality. Yes, it takes time. Of course it takes time. Changing law is easy in comparison.

The first step to fighting this battle is to understand the other side, and I mean to really understand them. Not just their arguments but their motivations.

Some of it is power, sure. Some of it is religious fervor. (For a really neat look at a new interpretation of homosexuality in Jewish thought, by the way, check out Wrestling with God and Men by Rabbi Steven Greenberg.) But a lot of it is fear and ignorance.

Humans fear The Other simply because it is different. If you’ve never encountered it before, it’s scary. Experience makes us open up to The Other, but those initial encounters are frightening. And for the bulk of America, the GLBT community is, sadly, The Other. It’s outside the American idea of normal, and a lot of Americans are either unaware they’ve met somebody from the GLBT community or they actually never have met somebody from the GLBT community. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to…well, you should know the rest.

Homosexuality also challenges the heterosexual’s worldview. It gets them questioning whether they, too, might be homosexual. It makes them wonder whether they, too, might be The Other that they fear. Questioning yourself and your identity is difficult enough; wondering if you might be something you fear is, I imagine, sheer torture.

And finally, lack of education. When all you hear is that loud, obnoxious voice telling you that homosexuality is wrong, when you never get the chance to hear the other side, or get to know somebody from the other side, then all you can believe is that homosexuality is wrong.

So, how do you – how do we – fight against it? Like I said above, this is a fight that requires thought and planning. You can’t beat someone over the head until they agree with you in this matter. Well, okay, you can, but that’s too much totalitarian for my tastes. So you have to get them to agree with you. And that’s a tricky thing to do.

The first is education. I know, big surprise, coming from a druid. But ignorance has to be fought with education. I’ve never met a pagan who doesn’t like to share their beliefs when prompted, and I’ve never met a pagan who doesn’t enjoy talking and educating if even in small ways. We’re a chatty bunch, and that can be used for so much good.

The second is how we act. I have, sadly, known the stereotypical gays: the women who are lesbians simply because they hate men, a man who is bisexual to stick it to his parents. These negative types color people’s perspectives of the GLBT community, even if they’re in the minority. This isn’t only something the GLBT community can do, either. We can respond to negativity about the GLBT community without being abrasive or harsh.

The third is media. How many pagans are in media settings? How many of us write or work with film or television or news or radio (or blog, for that matter!)? I don’t know how many of you have watched the show Firefly, but on the show there’s an interracial couple. And nobody mentions the fact that they’re interracial, which is kind of a big deal in modern society. But in the society of the show, it’s simply how things are. And because race isn’t brought to attention, most viewers simply gloss over it. Karen TravissWess’har series, a wonderful science fiction, brought up issues of polyamory and even examined current cultural attitudes about it, and because the characters involved kind of shrugged off any objections and had no problems, the relationship was just another fact. Not a big deal.

None of these are quick fixes. This isn’t something that will be over in my lifetime, sadly. The one thing we can change in a relatively short period of time is the law. And it’s going to have to be good enough for now. But everything else needs to come into place, because the law just doesn’t always cut it.

** While this was meant to be inclusive of those who identify as bisexual or pansexual or any other form of sexual, it’s so much easier for me to simply say homosexual. My most sincere apologies.

 

I’m writing this with a lot of fire, with a tumult of feeling and emotion. I prefer the reasoned, calm approach to situations, but I can’t settle down on this one. Everybody has political issues that get them riled up, and this is one of mine. It’s a shame that I’m so fired up right after Wooly’s nice, rational, well-thought post, too, but I take life as it hits me.

I believe that it is the job of the American government to protect the rights of the individual from anybody who would try to take those rights away. Every person should have the right to live their life as they want so long as they’re not taking away from the rights of others.

So it completely disgusts and sickens me to hear a possible 2012 presidential candidate say that gays and lesbians should not be allowed to adopt because “children are not puppies.” Mike Huckabee also said that homosexual marriage is akin to drug use, polygamy, and incest, and if we legalize gay marriage, why not the other three things?

My not so humble opinion on the matter? Unlike homosexuality, drug use is most often a choice. The individual made the conscious decision to use those drugs. A person doesn’t simply choose their sexuality. So comparing drug use and homosexuality is just completely ridiculous and a flawed argument designed to get a knee-jerk reaction. Incest is, in my opinion, squick. I’m talking consensual incest between two adult persons, here. And genetically speaking, it’s probably not the best idea. But I don’t see anything morally wrong with it and I don’t see anything flawed with the people who want to engage in it. And polyamory (used here in place of polygamy) – well, that I’ve got no problem with.

I really think the purpose of Huckabee’s statements was to elicit an emotional response. And he certainly succeeded. Comparing homosexuality to drug use, polygamy, and incest was really kind of silly to me, but it’s going to get a huge response from those who support gay marriage and those who don’t. Either way, his name is now going to stick with people.

As far as the “kids aren’t puppies” matter….does this mean that Huckabee is simply against adoption in general? I’m willing to bet the answer is no. Again, he’s looking for that emotional response. And guess what? He’s getting it. There isn’t any rationality behind his statement, no logical progression from “gay couple want to be parents” to “gay couples seeking to have children are the same as a couple wanting to have a puppy.”

But for all of the irrationality of Huckabee’s statements, for as mad as I got about what he said, I caught a single sentence that scared me more than a little bit. Mike Huckabee also stated that “not every group’s interests deserve to be accommodated.”

Yikes. I don’t want somebody who believes this in the White House. What makes one group more deserving than another? Who gets to judge that? I hearken back to respect for the individual, personally. I’m rather Objectivist at times: you as an individual deserve respect and the right to live your life as you see fit. Until you go and take away those rights from somebody else. Then you forfeit your rights. That’s the standard I hold to for most situations, because it works as a general rule with few exceptions.

And it certainly sounds like Huckabee’s more than a bit interested in denying rights to people he sees as undeserving. And sadly, in most cases, those “undeserving” are the Other: those not like himself. Pagans fall into that category, and I really think this is a situation we need to be aware of and worry about. What starts with one minority group quickly falls to others.

 

I suppose I ought to be careful what I wish for, right? I wasn’t planning on revisiting the marijuana topic at any point in the near future, really, but something entertaining has happened.

A small town in Colorado called Fruita has passed a law allowing for further taxation of medical marijuana. In addition to sales tax, people who purchase medical marijuana are also charged a 5% marijuana tax. It is the first city in the state to do so, I might add. And this tax was voted in with overwhelming numbers: 60% of voters were for it!

The amusing part (amusing to me, at least) is that Fruita doesn’t actually have a single dispensary anywhere in town.

Initial amusement aside, I feel kind of frustrated about this. Because part of me is okay with the taxation of the medical marijuana, but part of me really, really isn’t.

So, let’s start with why I’m not okay with the tax. Simply put: I don’t think it’s right to tax something medical. Marijuana as medicine appeals to people for a lot of different reasons. Many people I know appreciate the fact that it’s a natural substance that they can ingest for various problems. These people aren’t comfortable taking something chemical or fabricated; they’d rather take something naturally occurring. And while I might not agree, that’s fine. For some it’s personal choice, for others it’s religious. Whatever. Also, it can be taken in different forms, from inhaled to ingested. So those who might not be capable of swallowing a pill because their stomach is upset are more than able to inhale pot. More typical medicines aren’t a good choice for these types of people, but marijuana is perfect!

The extra tax seems obnoxious to people for whom marijuana is simply the best option.

But I also understand the reasons behind the tax. Because marijuana is currently a controlled substance, one that America gets into fights about and uses recreationally, there will probably be a lot of policing of any dispensary that opens. That costs money, and that money has to come from somewhere. It’s the entire reason I want marijuana legalized in the first place – if you can tax it, then hoorah! Cities and states are always in need of more money and tax is how they get it.

But the idea of taxing a medicine still doesn’t sit right with me. If I could go down to the grocery store and buy some for recreational use, then sure, tax me. I don’t have much problem with the taxes I pay on a good drink. I’m just not comfortable saying “it doesn’t feel right” as a good reason to think something, especially not in relation to political goings-on.

So, folks, here’s your chance to give me some feedback on this one, because other than the initial laugh I got from the news report, I just really don’t know what to think about this. So what about you? Think it’s good? Bad? And most importantly, why?

Oh, and as a side note, I didn’t hear much about how the Colorado Cannabis Convention went, but I did read a report saying that the legalization for marijuana, while years off, is looking like a real possibility.

 

Almost ten years ago, Coloradans legalized medical marijuana in Amendment 20. And now we’re getting ready to host the Colorado Cannabis Convention, which sounds to me like a weird mix of actual medicine, law, and partying. Sure, there’s going to be some intense discussion and debate about medical marijuana, but there’s also going to be glassblowing and songwriting contests. It’s also the butt of puns, some better than others.

I’m no expert on the subject of pot, but there are a lot of good things and bad things that come from marijuana. Wikipedia gives a pretty long (and only partial) list of uses for marijuana.

A Time Magazine article from 2002 pointed out that

“In patients with postoperative pain, THC is more effective than a placebo, and some reports suggest smoking pot may reduce the need for highly addictive opioids.”

This is kind of nice to know. I’m incapable of taking codeine derived medicines because they make me incredibly ill and I suffered quite a bit after surgery a couple years ago. The substitute was second rate and I was in agony for weeks. Having another option to manage pain like that is fantastic. The American Medical Association is itself reevaluating marijuana as a schedule 1 substance. Schedule 1 substances are narcotics that have no medical relevance. Keep in mind that cocaine is a schedule 2 drug, meaning that it can be administered by a physician for legitimate medical usage in spite of its high addiction rate.

On the other hand, BBC reported an increased risk of psychosis among those who smoke more potent forms of marijuana, and there is a risk of addiction to marijuana.

The health benefits are still being researched, but there are a lot of organizations that support medical marijuana, including the the American College of Physicians, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Marijuana is economically beneficial, too – think of the dispensaries that are making money on getting cannabis out the door. Seems like a win-win situation to me, doesn’t it? Companies and people make money, other people live without pain! In addition to that, some are beginning to think that it can do wonders for California’s economy. I’m all in favor of boosting the economy, especially right now. Creating jobs, boosting revenue, and letting people support themselves financially are beneficial to the rest of us.

A much more recent article from Time takes a look at cannabis yield in Afghanistan, which is enormous! It seems that farmers can make more money growing pot than they can growing opium, and that’s cool with me. It’d be great if they could grow more food, but I can’t blame them for wanting to bring in the big bucks to support their families. Especially because anti-drug campaigns in the Middle East just don’t seem to be doing anything short of putting farmers out of work.

I want to see marijuana legalized and regulated. I want to stop seeing my money go down the drain as cops and the Drug Enforcement Agency spend too much going after the (pardon the discriminatory language) potheads. Yes, medical marijuana and legalization of marijuana are two slightly different issues. But arguments for (or against) either one tend to go hand in hand.

With legalization of marijuana we get a lot of great things. The Marijuana Policy Project researched and published a report that

“estimates that marijuana legalization would yield tax revenue of $2.4 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like all other goods and $6.2 billion annually if marijuana were taxed at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco.”

Add that to the $7.7 billion that would be shifted elsewhere.

Oh, right. The government claims it’s not spending much money on the drug war.

“Of the $373.9 billion spent by federal and state governments, some 95.6 percent was spent to “shovel up the consequences and human wreckage of substance abuse and addiction,” while only 1.9 percent was spent on prevention and treatment, 1.4 percent on taxation and regulation, and less than 1 percent on research and interdiction, says the report from Columbia University’s National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.”

Does it bother anybody else that we as a country are spending a very tiny amount of money on researching these drugs? Instead, our money is being thrown at cleaning up problems that could be prevented. Instead of nipping it in the bud, we’re waiting for something to become a problem and then trying to fix it. And guess what? That’s not working.

And it seems in Colorado, at least, obtaining a license to receive medical marijuana is a joke or perhaps a convenient loophole to obtain pot. I mean, really, if I found a doctor willing to sign for me, I could say that because I have migraines and asthma, I ought to be allowed to use marijuana. Never mind that they’re both under relative control with other medications that do the job just fine.

So legalize it already. Make the folks happy and tax them. For the most part, they’re not actually doing any harm and they’re not actually endangering their selves. And if they’re doing something stupid while high – well, I lived in a college town for six years. I’m fairly certain that anything stupid somebody does while high is exactly the same as a lot of these kids did while drunk.

© 2012 Pagan+Politics Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha