Another election is coming up with all of the passion and intensity that comes with it. This election season has shaped up to be a particularly vicious one with partisans on both sides of the debate accusing the other of wanting to drive America off a cliff and into oblivion. Now by no stretch of the imagination am I anything approaching an objective observer in the process. Like any politically active Heathen I have a dog in this fight. That said there are things that are more important than my dog coming out on top.

This election season, at least in my limited life experience, has evolved into one of the ugliest in recent memory. Unfortunately this is hardly an anomaly, every election since 2002 seemed to be going for the gold in gutter politics and each successive election managed to find new and interesting ways to top the last. This has had a rather nasty effect on our community by forcing all political discussion through a highly partisan filter. The ugliness of political discourse coupled with the hyperpartisan atmosphere of American politics has effectively silenced the most important political conversation we should be having:

What do we, as a community, need to achieve through the political process for the sake of our communities and community?

Listening to the punditry politics has become a life-or-death fight to the finish. The partisans on both sides have consistently painted the other as a dire threat to the American way of life and that their way is THE way to fixing what ails our country. To cross the line, or work with, the other side has become anathema and finding a reasonable compromise is now ideological treason. Even with all the lip service given to “compromise” in reality the only compromise that happens is when one side forces the other to blink. The validity of an idea, based on its merits alone, has been replaced with an obsession with ideological correctness.

This thinking should have no place in our community. We are a polytheistic, pantheistic, animistic group of people. We have room for deity in many forms, not one limited by an old, heavily edited book. Dualistic, black and white theology and cosmology are ideas with very little following in our community. This thinking, a symptom of dualistic spirituality, is one of many things that should be considered incredibly stupid by Pagans and Heathens the world over.

Unlike Christianity we do not slot the world into two broad categories of good and evil. We have many Gods with many different personalities, aspects, and motivations. Instead of leading to internal tension and conflict this multiplicity of Gods has been a uniting force. Understanding these complex cosmologies is part and parcel of modern Paganism and Heathenry as is reconciling the old practices with modern day. If we are able to work with considerable differences in spirituality without a serious problem then politics shouldn’t be any less taboo. With our spiritualities we are willing to be mature and respect well-founded opinions. We shouldn’t be letting mainstream toxicity do the same with political discussion. It makes no sense on one hand to be willing to take a person for who they are regardless of faith on one hand and on another to make blanket decisions and assumptions about their politics. By making partisan assumptions about fellow Pagans and politics in general we divide and weaken ourselves.

Now I’m not expecting everyone to change their voter registration to the same party and vote in bloc. The odds of that happening are only slightly better than me flapping my arms and getting to the moon. What we can do is move beyond party labels, consider ideas on their merits instead of the sticker next to them, and remember that the Pagan activist on the other side of the party line stands beside you where it matters most. Reasonable people can agree to disagree on matters of opinion. Buying in to the life and death struggle narrative in the media only sets our most passionate, capable people against each other at the expense of our community. Accepting this big lie of black and white politics ensures our community, which neither party has the time of day for, will remain fighting itself instead of standing strong. Our spiritual world is open to many possibilities, why should our political world be cluttered with dualistic baggage?

Also published at http://ryansdesk.blogspot.com/2010/10/pagans-politics-and-parties.html

 

[The following is a guest-post from Peter Dybing. Peter identifies himself as a human activist who happens to be Pagan rather than a Pagan activist. His activism has included direct action on environmental issues, civil rights issues and freedom of religion. His first activist role was a meeting with the Governor of Colorado concerning school integration in 1969 at eight years of age.]

Recently our community was justifiably proud to see a Pagan Chaplain receiving an award for religious pluralism from the Hindu American Foundation. We have come a long way in gaining acceptance for earth-based traditions.

This event was also an opportunity to view how another minority community organizes its activities in support of gaining religious tolerance and acceptance on a national scale. Hindus number around two million in the United States, roughly twice the number of the Neo Pagan community. In terms of organization, the Hindu community has banded together and created a national voice on Hindu rights and acceptance. This organization has an office in Washington DC that works full time addressing the issues of civil rights, tolerance and religious pluralism.

So here is the question; are we as a community even half as effectively organized to gain or defend rights for Pagans?

It is tempting to provide a long list of organizations and individuals doing great work for Pagan rights in response to this question. Each of these deserves our respect for all they have accomplished.

Instead, lets address if this plethora of activities is keeping us from acting with unanimity? Is our approach analogous to a group of organizations playing Capture the Flag, where there are wins, but only by small groups and not the community as a whole? Does our duplication of effort squander resources and reflect that Paganism still needs to mature into an effective movement?

Addressing these questions requires putting aside both organizational self-interest and ego. There is no threat in engaging in discussion about the effectiveness of our efforts. Creating a process where our community can “keep eyes on the prize” serves the community as a whole.

We have many traditions that rigorously defend their independence in spiritual practice. This is a strength that allows all to have a voice and a personal relationship with the Devine. We should however, examine if this culture has led to the inability to truly unify in supporting goals that serve the entire community.

The Hindu community is a good example, a religious tradition that has many paths (sects), coming together to achieve their common interest. Efforts have been made to form an organization that serves this role in our community. None have achieved widespread and focused support. Each is a player in the metaphorical game of capture the flag.

There are, on the horizon, new models for achieving our goals. One of these is the example of Patrick McCollum, with a proven track record of fighting for the rights of all Pagan’s, Rev. McCollum sets an example for unity of action. While I personally support his efforts, only time will tell if we are ready to express our collective intent and financial support community wide.

Currently, Rev. McCollum and many other Pagan Rights Activists are spending their own funds, sacrificing their home lives and personal financial security in support of our rights. These individuals, who enjoy our spiritual support, deserve our corporeal support in the form of funds and active participation in creating a unified Pagan Rights Organization.

This call to action is not intended to address the efforts of our diverse community of Interfaith Activists. We as a community are well served by having interfaith representatives from different paths. It is in the area of civil rights, legal challenges, lobbying and legislative action where we need to come together as one voice.

If you are involved in guiding a Pagan organization, at any level, this is a call to start a discussion on how to unify our approach to Pagan rights beyond the boundaries of our traditions and established efforts. Avoid the temptation to offer your group as the answer, be open to unique ideas, and work together with other organizations in a unified effort.

One million Pagans, with one voice and collective intent can achieve the goals we have in common.

In Service to the Goddess,
- Peter Dybing

 

[The following is a guest post by Maelstrom from The Political Pagan. Maelstrom teaches at a small college in New York State. Prior to this, he studied in Iceland and taught at colleges in Japan and Eastern Europe. As a scholar, supporter and participant in modern-day Paganism, by which he mean forms of religion derived from native European religions, Maelstrom is interested to see what can come from applying Pagan perspectives to political issues, and political perspectives to our Paganism.]

Hello all. As part of a research project on the political views of Norse Pagans (=Heathens, Asatru members, Asatruar) in the USA. I have devised a poll on the topic for members of this Pagan community. However, after thinking more, I realized it would be useful to also ask members of non-Asatru, non-Norse Pagan groups, about their political perspectives. My hope is to be able to contrast the political profile of Asatru members with other Pagans. At this stage, I am only seeking responses from Pagans in the USA, but this could extend to other countries in the future. The survey is rather crude, only ten questions, but it is designed to at least highlight some broad-brush differences between right-wing and left-wing, conservative and liberal positions. I encourage you to participate either in the Asatru poll, if you are involved with Norse Paganism, or the non-Asatru poll, if you are Wiccan, Goddess-worshipping, Celtic, Hellenic, or other types of Pagan.

Note: these surveys are for USA citizens and residents only. I hope to develop versions for other countries in future, but at this point, USA only.

All responses are anonymous. Neither I nor anyone else will know who you are if you answer this survey. No such information is collected. The system is however designed to allow each person to respond to the survey only one time. You can change your answers up to the point where you exit, but once you do exit the survey, you cannot go back and change answers.

Here is the link for the Asatru survey:
Click here to take survey

Here is the link for the non-Asatru survey:
Click here to take survey

I will discuss results at a future date.

 

This post has very little to do with Paganism, and for that I apologize. But it is about political issues that Pagans went on and on about in the past, but now I just don’t hear much about anymore.  How did these issues drop off the Pagan radar?

Patriot Act: When the Patriot Act was streamrolled through Congress, there were some voices of dissent. Those voices were told to STFU in a pretty harsh manner and the majority of Americans were happy to trade their rights for the illusion of safety.  Very similar to how we traded in our rights to win the War on Drugs.  Both have been stunning successes.  (That’s gallows humor, if you are wondering)

As time went on, more and more people spoke out about this Act, people on the Left and people on the Right. (More on the Left than on the Right)  This reached a crescendo during the 2008 Presidential election. Repealing the Patriot Act was one of the reasons cited for why people voted for Obama.

Has the Patriot Act been repealed? No. It’s been extended and defended by the Obama Administration as a needed tool. But now the Patriot Act suddenly doesn’t matter. Where are the impassioned blog posts by Pagans about how Obama is an evil bastard for supporting the Patriot Act? How he is a fascist looking to create a police state and this is proof?

But there isn’t just silence on this issue. Oh no.

Military Tribunals: Right this very minute there is a military tribunal going on at GitMo. This tribunal is for a prisoner who was captured as a child, after his father forced him to fight starting when he was 9 years old.   In 2008 military tribunals were the worst thing ever.  2010…eh, what’s the big deal if we use it on victimized and kidnapped children?

GitMo, Due Process, Secret Foreign Prisons, Rendition: In 2008 the very concept of a place like GitMo was seen as a stain on our country’s honor. It had to close and close NOW! Except, it hasn’t. Even from those most adamant that it had to immediately close and Bush could have closed it when ever he wanted, I now read about how we have to patient and I’m sure it’s a pretty hard thing to do and we can trust Obama to do the right thing.

Not only that, but we opened another (larger) prison to indefinitely hold enemy combatants without charges in Afghanistan.

More than 600 detainees are held at the US Bagram Theatre Internment Facility – known by campaigners as “the other Guantanamo”. Not only are there no plans to close it, but it is in the process of being expanded to hold 1,100 illegal enemy combatants; prisoners who cannot see lawyers, have no trials and never see any evidence there may be against them.

Crickets are chirping regarding this.  And you don’t suppose, since the Obama Administration has “reserved the right” to use rendition, that a bit of “rough questioning” is being used on prisoners in Afghanistan?  Torture, denial of due process,  and secret prisons where people just disappear forever no longer seem to be much of a concern in the Pagan community.  Why?  Is it because about 75% of Pagans voted for our current President?  And since he’s on your team you’re going to overlook this?

I got to tell you, if you were a fan of Bush’s security, civil liberties, and war policies you have nothing to complain about with Obama. He has either continued or one-upped every Bush policy and act. So I find the criticism of Obama from some on the Right who were for these policies hypocritical. However, if you were an opponent of Bush’s policies, if the mere thought of rendition and warrantless wiretaps sent you into a frothing rage, why can’t Left-leaning Pagans muster up even mild irritation with Obama?

(Like a bad infomertical) But wait!  There’s more! More assaults on your civil liberties that you may not have heard about:

Law Enforcement in the USA are using full body scanning technology (like what airports are starting to use) in roving trucks to be able to look inside your vehicle as they drive by.  “It’s no surprise that governments and vendors are very enthusiastic about [the vans],” says Marc Rotenberg, executive director of The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). “But from a privacy perspective, it’s one of the most intrusive technologies conceivable.”

The police can also secretly place a tracking device on your car and they don’t need a warrant to do so.

There’s more, but I don’t want to depress myself.  But it would sure be great if more Pagans could get all fired up again like you were in past years.  You are still needed to fight the good fight.

Update:

Thanks to Michael (from the comments, below) for this.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) have filed a lawsuit challenging the government’s asserted authority to carry out “targeted killings” of U.S. citizens located far from any armed conflict zone.

The groups charge that authority contemplated by the Obama administration is far broader than what the Constitution and international law allow. Outside of armed conflict, both the Constitution and international law prohibit targeted killing except as a last resort to protect against concrete, specific, and imminent threats of death or serious physical injury. An extrajudicial killing policy under which names are added to CIA and military “kill lists” through a secret executive process and stay there for months at a time is plainly not limited to imminent threats.

 

[The following is a guest-post from Kathy Nance. Kathy is a freelance writer, green entrepreneur and lifelong Cardinals Baseball fan from St. Louis, Missouri. She also is the first Pagan to write for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch's Civil Religion blog.]

Oh, Albert.

Say it isn’t so.

Say it was just a horrible mass hallucination, that you didn’t really accept an award from GLENN BECK and share the stage with SARAH PALIN at that rally dishonoring the memory of Dr. Martin Luther King Saturday, August 28.

Because if it really was you—then Cardinals Baseball, the one thing that united St. Louisans, is now tainted for me.

St. Louis is a baseball town. Football teams have come and gone with just a change of fan jerseys. We’ve yawned when professional basketball foundered, barely rallied to keep professional hockey, and hardly noticed the demise of two soccer leagues. Or maybe three.

But Cardinals baseball is sacred. We forgave Mark McGwire the steroid allegations, extended dispensation to Tony LaRussa for being a California vegetarian, gave alms to the millionaire owners for a new stadium. But most of all, we have worshipped Albert of Pujols, the second coming of Stan “The Man” Musial. St. Albert. El Hombre.

I’ve admired him for his charity work among people with Down Syndrome. I respect that he points upwards after every home run, thanking his own God in his own way. He certainly deserves awards and recognition for leading an exemplary life off the field.

But did he have to accept it from Glenn Beck and his gang of racist theocrats?

I have to wonder whether Albert thought about how that might read to his non-white, non-Christian fans. Michael Jordan famously observed that Republicans buy shoes, too. Well, African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, and Pagans all buy baseball tickets, Albert. But I don’t think any of us would have been welcome at Glenn Beck’s rally. Or wanted to be. Shudder.

Think about this, Albert. If you weren’t El Hombre—if you were just a regular hombre scratching for work, how welcome would you have been at that rally? Glenn Beck, supporter of Arizona’s anti-immigration laws would have been among the first wanting you booted back where you came from. And he wouldn’t mean St. Louis.

As for me, well, if I’d known about the rally Saturday at the Stan Musial statue protesting your appearance at the BeckFest, Albert, I would have been there. Instead, I was at the International Festival at Tower Grove Park. Food, music, dances honoring people and religions from every inhabited continent. It was beautiful.

Too bad you missed it. It was St. Louis at its most diverse and its most unified, right down to the Cardinals baseball hats.

 

[The following is a guest-post from Peter Dybing. Peter identifies himself as a human activist who happens to be Pagan rather than a Pagan activist. His activism has included direct action on environmental issues, civil rights issues and freedom of religion. His first activist role was a meeting with the Governor of Colorado concerning school integration in 1969 at eight years of age.]

Islamophobia: A Threat to the Pagan Community

From rural Wisconsin to lower Manhattan Americans are mobilizing in opposition to the location of Islamic places of worship in their communities. With images of September 11th etched in it’s collective subconscious, our nation is once again traversing the slippery slope that leads to religious persecution, fear and outright bigotry.

Islam has become the convenient target of defamation, hate, suspicion and direct verbal attacks.  Americans in ever growing numbers freely tell anti Islamic jokes in public places.  If these attacks were aimed at another faith, minority or ethnic group there would surly be a substantial backlash.

So why should the Neo Pagan community become involved in defending the rights of a belief system that holds views so foreign to our earth based community?

Islam, an incredibly diverse group of faiths, is faced with being branded as intolerant and violent due to the actions of radical fringe groups.  We in the Pagan community have experienced attempts to paint us all with the same brush when individuals who claim to be Pagan commit violent acts.  Recent events in New Mexico and Australia make this clear.

To stand by and allow these forms of attack encourages those who believe that our country should not be tolerant of a diversity of beliefs.  If we do not stand in support of inclusion and respect we risk our own fight for Pagan rights through our lack of action.

There are many well-meaning people who have expressed concern with the placement of the Mosque in New York City. There are others, however, who have taken this opportunity to spread fear, hate, and bigotry.  They must be confronted

All threats to religious rights and tolerance are a threat to our community, our nation and our ability to openly worship the divine as we please.

It is not easy to come to the defense of a belief system so different than ours. Nor was it easy for Christian, Jewish and Islamic leaders to support the inclusion of Pagans in the interfaith movement. Yet, these leaders did it because it was the right thing to do. Now comes our opportunity to stand for what we believe.

Pagan Brothers and Sisters, join me in communicating to the Islamic community our support for their right to worship openly, when they want to and where they want to.  Confront those who oppose tolerance, Make our collective intent known.

In Service to the Goddess,
- Peter Dybing

I’d like to thank Peter for his guest post. For more debate and discussion concerning the Park51 community center and mosque in New York City, and Pagan reactions to that controversy, please see today’s post at The Wild Hunt. Also, I know this is a contentious issue, but please remember our comment policy, and keep discussions civil.

 

Politicians often use photos or video of themselves with local celebrities as a way to form a positive association in voters minds.  They hope that you will attribute the wonderful deeds and character of the celebrity to them.  Virtue by osmosis.   Or, at the very least, they hope an endorsement from them will help sway your vote.

In our town there is no bigger celebrity than Tazer the police dog.  Tazer has won the National Police Canine Champion 5 times and is a 7-time regional police canine champion.  Last May, when Tazer retired, the city of Austin, MN threw him a very well attended retirement party.  We love Tazer.  He has visited countless school children who collect his baseball style cards and is still a respected member of our community.   His two sons, Ghost and Bosco, are carrying on the family tradition of careers in law enforcement and winning awards in K-9 competitions.  Pride and love are lavished on this dog.

Which is why Deputy Jeff Ellis, who is running for Mower county Sheriff,   features a photo of himself with his former partner Tazer on the front of his campaign brochure and website. I understand why Ellis is doing that.  An endorsement from Tazer is about as good as it gets.

Note:  I will be attending the Sacred Harvest Festival, a lovely family friendly Pagan festival in SE Minnesota, all this week. The PNC-Minnesota Bureau, which I am part of, will be providing coverage of the event.

 

A pluralistic and diverse society is not easy to manage. One would think with several centuries of ethnic mixing, particularly in a country as diverse as the United States, that people would be used to getting along, or at least tolerating the differences between one another. But that does not seem to be the case. Our society seems to be fragmenting rather than blending.

There are many factors which give rise to antagonism: religion, nationalism, ethnicity, political ideology, and the old Marxist bogeyman, economics. And while we think of ourselves as a melting pot, the degree of mixing which has taken place has recently been called into question. We may co-exist to a degree but inter-marrying is less common.

Daniel T. Lichter recently reported on CNN that “According to a recent report by the Pew Research Center, one of every seven new marriages in 2008 was interracial or interethnic — the highest percentage in U.S. history.”

One in seven.

That isn’t a lot. About 14%. And “seemingly overlooked in the Pew Report is the finding that less than 5 percent of all married whites have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. The vast majority of whites today — as in the past — marry other whites” (The Supreme Court ruling that outlawed state prohibitions against interracial marriage did not come about until 1967).

Keep in mind too that some people marry only within the “tribe.” It was widely believed that Swedes and Norwegians couldn’t live together and many European ethnic groups arriving in the United States clustered together, out of need or desire. So even among “whites” there were limitations on the mixing taking place.

Of course, some whites feel differently, seeing even that miniscule amount (because it is rising) as a threat to white America. “Their concerns,” Lichter goes on to say, “are heightened by recent Census Bureau projections that the U.S. will become a majority-minority society by the middle of the century.”

Will the rising tide of immigration and immigrant birth finally complete the process of mixing?

In what can hardly be called a surprise, CNN recently reported that a new poll “indicates Americans have complicated views towards immigrants.”

The poll, a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national survey, shows that “the vast majority believe that most immigrants are basically good, honest people who are hard-working. However, nearly seven in ten say that immigrants are a burden on the taxpayer, 62 percent think they add to the crime problem, and 59 percent believe they take jobs away from Americans.”

Ouch. From the descendants of immigrants. Sounds like today’s immigrants are getting the same treatment once meted out to the Irish.

This poll is not referring simply to immigrants from south of the border, though I would be surprised if such thoughts did not influence the respondents. Instead, the poll, released Wednesday, “asks about all people who have immigrated from other countries in the past ten years, and not just about illegal immigrants in the U.S.” Doubtless far fewer immigrants today are “white” Anglo-Saxon compared to when our ancestors arrived from the Old World. Probably, far fewer of them are Protestants.

“The results may explain why most Americans think that the policies that made the U.S. a ‘melting pot’ strengthened the country a century ago but do not make the country stronger today,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

CNN asks whether, taking the “melting pot” metaphor a bit further, do Americans think that immigrants should maintain their own culture, or blend into the existing culture in this country?

The answer: “Two-thirds of whites say that immigrants should give up some important aspects of their culture to blend in; only about four in ten Hispanics, and an equal number of blacks, agree with that view,” adds Holland.

When my great-grandfather Tollef arrived in the Unied States, he did not speak any English. He wrote his letters home in Swedish. Wrote from the ranks of the Union Army during the Civil War. Was he less of an American because he kept elements of his native culture?

And how about Pagans? Paganism is and always has been a diverse phenomenon; all sorts of cultures, all sorts of ethnicities. This is as true today as it was in the ancient world. The common denominator was polytheism. This is not always the case today, but despite a broader interpretation of religion and spirituality, there is still a rejection of the Judeo-Christian idea of monotheism. There is the inclusion of nature, the inclusion of the feminine. There is a lot of inclusion and a lot less exclusion.

But even this rejection of one world view and the adoption of another does not have as a goal the destruction or negation of what is rejected. It adds a voice to the harmony; it does not remove one. It is more a matter advocating an acceptance of alternative forms of religion. The view of Judeo-Christian monotheism is, on the other hand, that all alternative forms of religion are inferior, wrong, and must (and will eventually) give way to the “True” religion.

Of course, we have three competing Abrahamic faiths all insisting they have possession of that exclusive Truth so the religious issue is problematic, especially when the sacred teachings of none of them espouse tolerance. After all, where the capital-T truth is concerned, there is no room for tolerance of what is not true. Even if alternative religionists wanted to join the True religion they couldn’t; there is no way to tell who has it, if anybody does.

The evils of nationalism have been well noted. The First World War is about as powerful a comment as one can make on the subject. The 60s anti-war protests about as powerful a rejection. Now, with the rise of American Exceptionalism, the pendulum has swung back the other way and the “constructed other” is again rejected, not welcomed. Hate and mixing are mutually compatible. American Exceptionalism is as ugly today as Prussian Nationalism was a century ago.

And unrestrained, it may lead us to the same place.

Ethnic squabbles are nothing new. They’re old beyond the extent of the historical record. We can look at the Old World over the past few centuries. We can look at the Balkans today or at Africa. America has had its own share.

But despite all these differences, people can get along. It has been proven. By Pagans. And I would argue that if Pagans cannot manage it today, nobody can. We have our own history to support us. We do not all have to believe the same things, or anything at all, to get along. Because there is no pressing need for others to believe the way you do, the religious equation ought to simply go away.

But how do Pagans cope with increasing polarization in the religious and political landscapes? Ancient pagans might have been drawn together by what they shared – polytheism’s non-exclusivity – but today’s version of religion – largely monotheistic and exclusivist, pushes people apart. Nothing can be shared when each group adopts an exceptionalist stance, be it due to religion or an excess of nationalism, ideology or some other cause.

Fast growing religion or not, Pagans are a drop in the bucket of American diversity. Can what we have in common, in the words of Jan Assmann (Moses the Egyptian 1997:3), “function as a means of intercultural translatability”? Fostering our common humanity, looking for connections, seems far more helpful a course than creating more gaping cracks between us, doesn’t it?

Disagree we might, but if we Pagans cannot tolerate each other, if we can’t translate inter-culturally, how can there be hope for anyone else?

The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted July 16-21, with 1,018 adult Americans questioned by telephone, including a special sample of 308 black and 303 Hispanic respondents. The survey’s overall sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points.

 

That’s right, folks, we are less than 100 days away from November 2nd. As the date approaches I’ll be writing about topics and candidates that catch my eye, but today I’m picking a different type of topic and one that I hope you will join in on – just a few adjustments I wish would be implemented that would make systemic changes in our government.

These suggestions come from the Athens during its Golden Age as a democracy. I’m not enamored of every, or even most, methods they had for governing themselves, but they did have a few stunningly fabulous ideas that worked well.

Holding office by lottery – The Council of 500, an assembly meant to represent the citizens through preliminary debate, was chosen once a year by lottery from all citizens irrespective of wealth or class. It may seem a bit odd to do this, but the reasons for it are as needed today as they were in 487BCE. It reduced the chances of corruption or undue influence brought to bear on governmental officials, it spread both the benefits and responsibilities of active citizenship throughout the population, and it ensured a true voice of the people in government.

We don’t have a Council of 500, but we do have 435 Congresspersons elected to the House of Representatives every two years. Using a lottery system of all registered voters to appoint Congresspersons to the House for a two year term would bring the same benefits as it brought to Athens – lessening corruption, encouraging active participation in government, more citizens would have first hand experience in how laws are created and would see their effects, but the greatest benefit would be in representation. The House, in our form of government, was designed to more closely represent the voice and will of the citizens. That’s in theory. In practice, the House is filled with people who are mostly male, white, Protestant, belong to the upper class, and started out as attorneys. Is that representative of our citizenry? Do they understand the desires, needs, and daily experiences of the average person, let alone a non-average person? A lottery would immediately change the make up of the House to look much more like the population of the USA instead of a country club in Boston.

A concern that people may have is that Congress would be filled with “unqualified” persons and that could lead to ruin. After all we want more intelligent and knowledgeable people than us making decisions for us. Falling for that line of thinking is what has reimposed a ruling class on the USA. One usually based more on wealth than on family lines, created by such false criteria as an Ivy league education and the patronage system. We have allowed ourselves to become convinced, through the machinations of this same ruling class, that we just aren’t smart enough to govern ourselves and we need to be guided by them. This is a lie. Who knows better than a small business owner what is needed for small business to thrive? Who knows better than a minority what is happening in their communities and the challenges they face? Who knows better than a college student how difficult it is to get your degree? We all have experiences and ideas that are critical to the success of our country. Even looking on the negative side, how could Congresspersons chosen by lottery do worse than our present elected officials?

I wouldn’t mind seeing a lottery system put into place for appointing House members at the state level, either.

Ostracism – Athens had a safety valve to stop any one individual from growing too powerful – ostracism. Each year all citizens would vote if they wanted to hold an ostracism. If two thirds said yes, then tow months later the ostracism was held. Citizens would write the name of the person they wanted banished and if one person got enough votes, they were exiled from Athens for ten years, but did not lose their property or citizenship. In theory, this could happen every year. In practice, it was rarely used.

Just think how this could change the behavior of some of our politicians and citizens if they knew they could be booted off the island for ten years. I would change it a bit from what Athens instituted. I would increase the number of potential ostracisms to 5 year year, our population is many times over what Athens was. I would also exempt judges and current political office holders from possibility of ostracism during their time in office. Otherwise we would be having special elections most every year.

The downside of this is I can see it being used to exile celebrities that we are sick of hearing about. I know I would be tempted to cast a vote for Lindsey Lohan.

True democratic voting for major issues – For most every major decision, the citizens of Athens voted yes or no after listening to a debate. They were able to do this because it was a small city and most of its citizens could gather in one place and vote with a show of hands. For a long time, this type of direct democracy wasn’t possible on a national scale in the USA. We couldn’t get information out to the majority of our citizens in a timely manner and just having a Presidential election every four years was difficult.

Now, this is a possibility. I don’t think we could have a nation-wide vote for every law proposed, but we could set a few important things aside that would be reserved for a direct ballot by registered voters. I strongly feel that declarations of war and acceptance of peace treaties should only come to pass with a super majority direct vote. This would mean increased expense and preparation to make this possible, but decisions of this importance should only be made in accordance to the will of the people – especially the will of the very people who are expected to go an fight.

So that’s my wish list. If you could make a few adjustments, what would they be?

 

Yep. That’s right. The judge who ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional is clearly an uneducated, red-neck, racist intent on bringing back segration.

How did I come to that conclusion? Just read what he wrote in his opinion:
“The federal government, by enacting and enforcing DOMA, plainly encroaches upon the firmly entrenched province of the state, and in doing so, offends the Tenth Amendment. For that reason, the statute is invalid,” Judge Tauro wrote in a ruling in a lawsuit filed by Attorney General Martha Coakley.  Yes, that Martha Coakley.

The judge is using a States’ Right argument as the basis for ruling that DOMA is unconstitutional and needs to go. States’ Rights. I know. Everyone knows that when people talk about States Rights that is code for hatin’ the black folk and wanting the Confederacy to rise again. That’s what I’m informed of when I note that as a Conservative, I’m a strong supporter of States Rights (aka Federalism or New Federalism or mockingly called “Tenthers”).

I’ve written the above portion of the post satirically as I’m both very pleased with the ruling yet frustrated by a lack of understanding or appreciation of what being an advocate for States’ Rights means.  Aside:  To read a much better version of satire, or Satyr – mocking criticism of societal conventions – you may want to give this a once over.

Being a Hellenic Pagan, with it’s history of autonomous poleis with varying laws and customs, has only slightly reinforced a favorable view of that philosophy. Not that I’m blind to all the problems such a system of closely allied states can have. After all, we tried it from 1777 to 1789 and had to make some well-reasoned adjustments to how we ran our government and what the roles of local, state, and federal authority would be. Now, if only we could institute formal ostracism for a set period of time for public figues who piss us off or annoy us like they had in Athens.  Wouldn’t that be nice?

Back to States Rights and if it is “code” or “dog-whistle” politics for racist policies.

Yes, some of the people advocating for States Rights really are pushing for a return to segregation. Not many, but there are people who are that bigoted and backward. But States’ Rights no more equals racism than Asatru equals white supremacy. Or Wicca equals evil witches.

The political concept of States Rights and Federalism existed long before the “Southern Strategy” of courting white southern voters longing for a return to segregation by Republicans to gain power in the South after the Civil War ever came into being. (The interesting thing about the Southern Strategy is that it was an attempt by the GOP to break the hold Democrats had over the South since the end of the Civil War.  A hold that was based on state sanctioned and enforced racism by the Democrats.  Which was, in turn, a reaction to the racial equity reforms enacted by Radical Republicans during Reconstruction.)  I could get into a detailed explaination of the meaning and history of Federalism, but can we just say that Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between Federal, State, and Local governments? That those of us who are Federalists think that, at this time, the Federal government has unconstitutionally usurped too much power by using the 10th admendment and the “Necessary and Proper” clause.

The 10th amendment is possibly the most misused and misinterpreted amendment in the entire constitution. It has been stood on its head to allow the Federal government to sieze authority that should belong to either the States or the People. The 10th amendment was created to reinforce the idea that all powers not specifically granted to the Federal government nor prohibited to the States by the Constitution of the United States are reserved to the States or the people.

The 10th amendment also contains a little something called the “commerce clause” and it is that which the Federal government used for about 60 years (from 1938 to 1995) as a club to forcibly steal power away from the States and from the People while the Supreme Court laid down like a doormat. In all of that time, SCOTUS did not overturn a single federal law or regulation enacted using the commerce clause as a basis to force States into compliance and uniformity. The Federal government argued that if it crosses state lines, they have the authority to regulate it or have legislative power over it. Problem being theysay that everything crosses state lines, therefore States don’t really have authority over much of anything. This greatly weakened the ideal of limited and enumerated powers for the Federal government.

The tide has been turning, a bit, in the courts regarding the interpretation of the 10th amendment. No longer are courts interpreting the amendment as carte blanche justification for federal law enacted with the intent to force states to comply with federal wishes and to conform.

Which gets us back to Judge Tauro’s ruling in saying DOMA is unconstitutional. He used the 10th amendment (and 14th) in his ruling, but instead of using it (as it had been) to strengthen DOMA by saying that the Federal government can force States to comply with DOMA, he used it to argue that the 10th amendment grants each States the authority to decide for itself to DOMA or not to DOMA. That the federal government had no right to force states into outlawing gay marriage if thier citizens wished otherwise.

Now, if we can just get the courts to bring the Comity Clause into play, that would make me even happier. A marriage is a contract that should be treated like any other contract or public record, which means “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.” A gay marriage in Iowa should be legal and recognized in all 50 states.

I have a few odds and ends notes to close with:

1. Don’t get out the champagne just yet. This ruling is not binding on other states.

“This is a decision from a trial judge in the federal court. Unless and until the First Circuit decides to weigh in — and/or the Supreme Court of the United States, it doesn’t have any binding precedent on other states,” David Frank, Senior News Reporter for Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.

2. And yet…I am concerned that this ruling could spark a US constitutional amendment similar to how court rulings at the state level spurred 30 states to amend their constitution to limit marriage to one man and one woman.

3. The DOJ may appeal this ruling but that does not mean they agree with DOMA. They may appeal it in an attempt to get it before SCOTUS to have THEM strike it down.

4. And finally, a note to my fellow Conservatives. For decades we have spoken passionately about States’ Rights, Federalism, the 10th amendment, and checking the ever expanding power of the Federal goverment. If that is a true, core belief of ours than we should be thrilled by this ruling no matter how we feel (for or against) about gay marriage. If you aren’t, then yeah, you are the reason why Liberals can tar us with the States’ Rights = Racism meme. I would appreciate it if you would stop posing as a principled Conservative when you are clearly nothing of the sort. Conservatives who oppose the States’ Rights arguement in this case because they support the statute in question are every bit as hypocritical as Liberals who see States’ Rights arguements as code for racism to then applaud the ruling because they oppose DOMA.  But this wouldn’t be the first time Conservatives were hypocrites when it came to championing States’ Rights.

© 2012 Pagan+Politics Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha