Islamophobia has been on the rise since 2001. The latest cause célèbre of conservative opponents of Islam is the Park 51 Islamic Cultural Center. The extent of this opposition is shown by the intentional mislabeling of this project as the “Ground Zero Mosque” despite the by now well known facts – that it is not at Ground Zero but two blocks away (it is not even visible from Ground Zero) and it is not a mosque, cut a community center with a prayer area. Imagine a hospital with a chapel. Do we call that a church?

I don’t. I go into a hospital quite frequently which has not only a chapel but pictures of Jesus on a little table by the door.

Things have gotten so out of control that it is being suggested by some on the right that great Americans “give up their rights” and that Muslims ought to forfeit their Constitutional guarantee of free exercise and go somewhere else, or that Islam is not really a religion at all but a cult, and is therefore not protected by the Constitution. Qur’an burnings have even been announced; an act of violence by Christians somehow meant to demonstrate “once and for all” that Islam is a violent religion.

What is a Pagan to think about this feeding frenzy of angry monotheists? One possible response would be to say, “Well, it’s between them; it doesn’t concern me.” I am here to argue that such a response would be mistaken. It does concern us. It concerns everyone because it concerns a Constitutional guarantee that is under attack by the dominant culture.

Conservative Christians have constructed a new narrative for America, a Mythic America that was founded by and for Christians, an America in which free exercise applies only to Christians, and in which the wall of separation is a myth. The First Amendment ensures that all Americans can practice their religion of choice – or none at all. When the dominant culture – in this case Christianity – takes it upon itself to decide to whom Constitutional guarantees apply, it is time to worry.

Naturally, anyone who defends Islamic rights is accused at worst of being a terrorist, or of being somebody who is “soft” on terrorism. Islam has become the communism of the new millennium, and we should all be searching under our beds for Islamofascists, one of the wonder new terms the right has gifted us. I have been attacked myself, and just recently, for defending Islamic rights in this country. For it is not just conservative Christians who are up in arms and misinformed, but Pagans too. The hysteria is widespread.

But I am not here to defend Islam. My own views on monotheism are hardly a secret to anyone who has read my pieces over the past few years. But my views on monotheism in general or Islam in particular are hardly applicable to this case, for this case is not about Islam but about the Constitution. And the Constitution says that a Muslim group can build a community center wherever they want. There is nothing illegal about it. They did not steal the land. They made a deal with a developer and they are using the site of an old coat factory in the same way that some Christian-oriented group might.

The only difference is that they are Muslims.

And it was Muslim terrorists who attacked the World Trade Center on 9/11.

The thing is, it wasn’t THESE Muslims. And mis-characterizations of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, a man with a reputation as a progressive interfaith leader, as an agent of America’s destruction are simply character attacks aimed at creating at atmosphere of fear and resentment. Fear is the coinage of Republican politics and has been since 2001. Fear of minorities, fear of immigrants, fear of non-Christians, fear of feminists, secular humanists, atheists, the LGBT community – and fear of Islam. It is easy to rally people around fear-inspiring causes – Irish immigrants, Germans in WWI, Japanese in WWII, communists in the 50s, Muslims today.

The situation gets very confused – as it’s meant to – fear mongering inspires neither calmness nor rational thought. Fear demands that people respond on a visceral, atavistic level, from the gut, in the same way that George W. Bush ran the country for eight years, from the gut. It is an anti-intellectual stimulant, fear is, and it brooks no argument.

For a Pagan, to get back to my original point, such attacks should resonate on a level invisible to most monotheists, who have a long history of being the persecutors rather than the persecuted. Once upon a time it was the witches who were being sometimes literally fed to the fires of hate. It isn’t all that long ago that being a Pagan was against the law, or that being a Pagan could cost you your job or your home. Rather than jumping up and joining those who would tear down freedom of religion, we ought to be defending those whose rights are under attack. Because next time, it could be us.

Can anyone forget the words of Jerry Falwell or the agreement of Pat Robertson in the aftermath of 9/11 on the 700 Club?:

JERRY FALWELL: And I agree totally with you that the Lord has protected us so wonderfully these 225 years. And since 1812, this is the first time that we’ve been attacked on our soil and by far the worst results. And I fear, as Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, said yesterday, that this is only the beginning. And with biological warfare available to these monsters — the Husseins, the Bin Ladens, the Arafats — what we saw on Tuesday, as terrible as it is, could be miniscule if, in fact — if, in fact — God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve.

PAT ROBERTSON: Jerry, that’s my feeling. I think we’ve just seen the antechamber to terror. We haven’t even begun to see what they can do to the major population.

JERRY FALWELL: The ACLU’s got to take a lot of blame for this.

PAT ROBERTSON: Well yes.

JERRY FALWELL: And, I know that I’ll hear from them for this. But, throwing God out successfully with the help of the federal court system, throwing God out of the public square, out of the schools. The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way — all of them who have tried to secularize America — I point the finger in their face and say “you helped this happen.”

PAT ROBERTSON: Well, I totally concur, and the problem is we have adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government. And so we’re responsible as a free society for what the top people do. And, the top people, of course, is the court system.

Can we so easily forget that it was Pagans Falwell blamed first, and not Islam? Does anyone seriously think that if they succeed in depriving the world’s second largest religion of their Constitutional rights that they will hesitate to do the same to Pagans?

The threat to the Constitution is very real. Conservative Christians, religious zealots known as dominionists, wield a degree of power in this country far out of proportion to their numbers. Study right-wing Christian theocracy; study the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). Study Sarah Palin and her witch-hunting pastor. People like to scoff, but then, people scoffed at Hitler too.

And look where they ended up.

No, I don’t have to think twice to know where I stand. With religious freedom and with the Constitutional guarantees I was born with, and not just for me, but for everyone.

 

I don’t believe the right wing(nuts) are going to take over the Federal government and create a theocracy. Nor do I believe the left wing(nuts) are going to take over the Federal government and move us into socialism/communism. Our Federal system of government has too many built-in checks and balances to allow us to swing further than somewhat uncomfortable for the other side. I find people who prattle on about either case to be a bit of a bore, as well as wildly inaccurate in their ability to research facts and trends. And they are wasting time yelling the ‘sky is falling’ about a non-issue whilst ignoring real problems.

I do believe there is a danger, and we’re already in trouble. It comes, interestingly enough, from both sides. And it involves education in both cases. The danger is in too tightly focusing on the broad national partisan fight when there are closer local issues that are just as (if not more) important.

Fundamentalist Right

Over the past decade or so the fundamentalists have stealthily invaded and taken over key positions under the radar which are hurting us. What am I talking about? K-12 education. By running for and winning positions on local schools boards and on boards who influence both course curriculum and textbooks, they have managed to have an influence far larger than their numbers allow at a national level.

The latest saga is the Texas textbook fight (see, for example, the NY Times article Texas Conservatives Seek Deeper Stamp on Texts). But this wasn’t done by some group of crypto-conspirators sulking in back alleys. It was done by pure democracy – by the conservatives running for, and winning, mostly lightly or uncontested spots on the Texas State Board of Education. And Texas, being such a large state, seriously impacts the textbooks for the rest of the US. Although there are quite a few areas where perhaps their impact has provided a more balanced presentation, there are others where it has not.

From, again, a NY Times article:

In reality, this controversy is the latest version of a debate that reaches back many decades and is perhaps essential in a heterogeneous democracy whose identity has long been in flux…
Even the Texas curriculum’s most disputed item – its assertion that the Founders envisioned America as a divinely inspired Christian nation – is not as radical as it sounds.
In 1964, in a series of lectures on America’s founding documents, starting with the Mayflower Compact, the political scientist Willmoore Kendall theorized that “the nascent society that interprets itself in the Compact is in some sense a religious, more specifically a Christian, society, which calls God in as witness to its act of founding.”
Mr. Kendall teased out the implications through close readings of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. But his analysis stressed the “symbolic” aspects of those texts, and his nuanced discussion drew on counterarguments by other scholars.
In contrast, the Texas board’s description of America as a “Judeo-Christian” nation treats ideas and events that have been under continual reinterpretation and revision for decades as literal and settled truth.

— From In Texas Curriculum Fight, Identity Politics Leans Right

Socialist Left

Likewise the socialist left has invaded and taken over many university and college campuses, strangling Freedom of Speech and freedom of expression. In pursuit of political correctness, many colleges have espoused limitations on what can be said and who can say it, typified by the following quote regarding not allowing Ann Coulter to speak at the University of Ottawa:

“I was just worried that things were going to be said about certain groups of people that were going to make them feel very unsafe and very uncomfortable and we promise our students here at the University of Ottawa a safe, positive space,” said Rita Valeriano, a second-year sociology and women’s studies student.

Whereas University Affairs in an opinion editorial states:

Some of the central tenets of a university education are critical thinking, intense debate and the adventurous search for truth. Faculty and students must be free to ask challenging questions and to express provocative and even at times offensive opinions without fear of official sanction or censorship. If university campuses become places where highly controversial subjects cannot be vigorously debated and challenged through words, images and non-violent actions, then where in society can we expect freedom of expression to prevail?

That many students may find the material distributed by some anti-abortion groups disturbing, offensive or misleading likely provides valid grounds to challenge these groups. The proper response, however, is argument – not censorship. To quote Noam Chomsky, “if we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise we do not believe in it at all.”

I may not believe in everything (or almost anything) Ann Coulter (or Michael Moore) have to say, but I strongly believe they should have the right to come on campus and say it, regardless of how many students it might ‘make uncomfortable’.

Many colleges are implementing ‘free speech zones’ and then restricting free speech outside of those zones. Frequently these zones constitute a very small percentage of the entire campus and may be in out-of-the-way places. Almost all the universities have lost when these zones were challenged in court; see free speech zones for a good review.

Oddly Balancing

Although I’d like to see an end to both of these intrusions, I am perhaps a bit mollified to note that, for someone who finally graduates with at least a bachelorate, they will have been exposed alternately to both sets of extremes during their educational tenure.

What can you do? Be more active.

Pay more attention to local politics. Who sets your local and state educational policies? Who creates or approves curriculums and textbooks? How are they elected or appointed? Find out and get active.

What colleges or universities do you have nearby? What are their free speech policies? What organizations do they have on campus? What speakers have they had? Can you suggest to any of them to perhaps bring in a Pagan speaker or speak yourself?

For further reading

 

The supreme court announced this week that it would be considering the Westboro Baptist church case. A quick overview: The WBC is a family “church” out of Topeka, Kansas. The patriarch is Fred Phelps and most of the “church” members are either family or extended family. Phelps was a lawyer until his disbarrment and I, growing up in Topeka, had the “privledge” to go to school with several of his children. Back in grade school days he sent the kids out to sell candy and such to support the church. By the kids own account, he was harsh in his punishment of them if they didn’t meet expectations, to the extent of shaving the head of one of the girls, a fifth grader if memory serves, and reported beatings.

Somewhere in the late ’80′s, I think it was, (feel free to see Wickipedia for more in depth as well as examples of their signage, etc.) the members began picketing Gage Park in Topeka, a reputed gay encounter area, as well as street corners in the community. Signs were graphic to say the least, and there were numerous incidents with community members. I don’t know how many times they sued the city over their “oppression” by the local law enforcement community. Finally, by accord, the local media pretended they no longer existed and for 10 years or so they were just a sorry fact of life for Topekans. For the next decade they traveled around the country, anywhere they thought they could find the media spotlight. They protested at the funerals of Jerry Falwell, Matthew Shepard, Mr.Rogers and on and on. By their account they have picketed over 41,000 times in over 650 cities since 1991.

Then, in 2005, they hit on the one thing that brought national attention. They began protesting at soldiers funerals, putting forth their “belief” that God was punishing America for it’s acceptance of homosexuality by killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. No longer was the country willing to be silent and hope they would just go away. Sixteen men, veterans from Post 36 of the American Legion Riders out of Mulvane, Kansas formed the Patriot Guard to stand, at the invitation of family, as a shield between the funeral of a fallen soldier and the cult. The “mission” of the Patriot Guard spread quickly. I was the 486th member of what has become over 185,000 members worldwide and to date I have attended over 30 of these missions.

In 2007  Al Snyder, the father of a Maryland Marine, sued the church and the Phelps’ for invasion of privacy for their protest at his son’s funeral and won a judgement of 11.8 million dollars. This was reduced to 5 million by the judge and later overturned by the 4th circuit court of appeals. Snyder has asked the Supreme Court to hear the case.

Which finally brings us to the point of this post: When does (if ever) the 1st amendment not apply to free speech? Is the WBC protected in their “God hates fags” “Thank God for dead soldiers” rhetoric? If so are they free to protest wherever and whenever they choose? Does the right of a grieving family take precedent over the WBC’s right to free speech and free practice of it’s religious beliefs?

Some here have accused me, good naturedly, of being a “closet conservative” so my answer will likely surprise many of you:  I find the Phelps’ and their “church” as vile and disgusting as anything on this earth. Their message is filled with hate and contempt and in my opinion has no place whatsoever in a civilized society. That being said, I believe that the case will, and should, be thrown out. I believe they are indeed protected by the 1st amendment.

Wow! Duane, how can you say that?

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean just the polite sunshine, kittens, puppy dogs, and rainbows. Freedom of speech is not needed, or intended, for “Of Mice and Men”. It is for “The Turner Diaries”. Freedom of the press is not for “CBS News”. It is for “Glenn Beck” and  ”Keith Olbermann”. Freedom of religion is not for the quiet Protestant service, or the secluded catecism. It is for you and I, as we please, and in public if we so choose. For if we limit the freedom of one group to speak their mind, or practice their faith, no matter how twisted we may think it to be, we all lose freedom in the end. Sooner or later it will be our point of view that does not conform to the “acceptable”, and freedom lost is seldom regained. As vile as I find their message, I regrettably defend their right to speak it.

© 2012 Pagan+Politics Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha